
DISTRIBUTION - The analysis of the injury data clearly demonstrates that the IPCS physical capability
assessment program had a dramatic impact on reducing both the frequency and severity of
injury as measured by incident rate, total cost of injuries and average cost per injury in
comparison to the Not Tested Group for all injuries and exertion injuries. The combination of
reducing the frequency of injury and reducing the average cost per injury resulted in greater
savings and return-on-investment for the COMPANY with the IPCS program.
If the IPCS program had been in place during the 24-month period for the Not Tested Group,
the net savings minus the cost of the program would have been $513,548. ![]()
DISTRIBUTION - The analysis of the injury data clearly demonstrates that the IPCS physical capability
assessment program had a dramatic impact on reducing both the frequency and severity of
injury as measured by incident rate, total cost of injuries and average cost per injury in
comparison to the Not Tested Group for all injuries and exertion injuries. The combination of
reducing the frequency of injury and reducing the average cost per injury resulted in greater
savings and return-on-investment for the Company with the IPCS program. If the IPCS program had been in place during the 16-month period for the Not Tested Group, the net savings minus the cost of the program would have been $512,973 or a 62% reduction in the actual Incurred Costs.
MANUFACTURING - A Four-Year Injury Analysis To Determine the Effectiveness Of the IPCS Physical Capability Evaluation Program On Reducing Exertion Injuries For A Large Food Manufacturer. (Spring, 2005)
The following case study was completed over a 23-month period on a pilot basis for a national gas cylinder distribution company. The case study focused on 5 locations that collectively employed about 200 individuals. The study shows that a company does not need to be a Fortune 1000 to reap the benefits of the IPCS technology. Smaller companies can realize the same return-on-investment by reducing the frequency and severity of injuries through the IPCS program. (Fall, 2005)
The analysis of the injury data clearly demonstrates that the IPCS physical capability
assessment program had a dramatic impact on reducing both the frequency and severity of
injury as measured by incident rate, total cost of injuries and average cost per injury in
comparison to the Not Tested Group for all injuries and exertion injuries. The combination of
reducing the frequency of injury and reducing the average cost per injury resulted in greater
savings and return-on-investment for the COMPANY with the IPCS program.
If the IPCS program had been in place during the 24-month period for the Not Tested Group,
the net savings minus the cost of the program would have been $513,548.
The analysis of the injury data clearly demonstrates that the IPCS physical capability
assessment program had a dramatic impact on reducing both the frequency and severity of
injury as measured by incident rate, total cost of injuries and average cost per injury in
comparison to the Not Tested Group for all injuries and exertion injuries. The combination of
reducing the frequency of injury and reducing the average cost per injury resulted in greater
savings and return-on-investment for the Company with the IPCS program.
If the IPCS program had been in place during the 16-month period for the Not Tested Group,
the net savings minus the cost of the program would have been $512,973 or a 62%
reduction in the actual Incurred Costs.
This L-T-L case study shows significant workers' compensation savings because of the IPCS program. An additional benefit comes with the recommendation of a more fit and healthier individual. (2004)
A Comprehensive Analysis and Case Study for A Large US LogisticsTrucking Company Showing Injury Rates and Injury Costs Comparing IPCS Tested Employees to Employees Not Tested Over a 3-year Period. (2002)![]()
This case study clearly shows the IPCS techology to be superior to otherkinds of physical capability assessments including an isokinetic knee-shoulder-back assessment vendor when comparing average cost perinjury. The data was analyzed from January 1993 through August 2000 for a Logistics Trucking company. (2000)![]()
Review two case histories from less-than-truckload companies. The data shows the reduction in injuries to the knees, shoulders, and back. It also shows the IPCS technology to be more effective than another "isokinetic" testing vendor that uses an isokinetic knee-shoulder-back testing protocol when testing for the same company. (2000)![]()
Review trucking company data that shows a reduction in frequency and costs associated with overexertion injuries to the knees, shoulders and back. (2000)
This 35-month study shows that the IPCS evaluation to be significantly more effective in reducing the frequency of injuries and worker's compensation costs than a functional capacity evaluation (FCE). (2004)![]()
This case study compares the IPCS program to the Advance Ergonomics program. The results clearly shows that the IPCS program is more effective to the AEI program. (2003)
Comparative Study Tracking Injuries for 3-Years for a Historical Group vs. an IPCS Physical Capability Assessment Group. (2002)![]()